How conservation status works

A conservation category is one of the most useful facts you can know about a species — and one of the most misunderstood. Here is what it does and does not tell you.

Status is a snapshot, not a permanent label

Every IUCN assessment describes a species at a moment in time. As habitats shrink or recover, as new field surveys are completed, and as assessment methods improve, species are reassessed and can move between categories. A “Vulnerable” listing today is not a promise about next decade. That is why FaunaHub never presents conservation status as fixed and always links to the live source.

Global status versus national status

IUCN Red List categories describe global extinction risk. A species can be globally threatened while remaining locally common in part of its range, or be globally secure but protected nationally. National and regional assessments — for example a country's own red list or endangered-species law — can differ from the global category and are maintained by separate authorities.

How source verification works here

For each record, FaunaHub records the species' common and scientific name, its category, and links to authoritative references. We confirm that each source link resolves during a review pass, and we flag how much of the record has been individually re-verified. We do not copy IUCN assessment text, maps, or datasets; we summarise categories in original language and point you to the original.

What the review date means

The review date is when FaunaHub last reviewed a record against its listed sources. It is not the date of the IUCN assessment, which may be older or newer and is shown separately where FaunaHub has checked the record against IUCN's published Red List data — with the date of that check. Because status can change between our reviews, the official IUCN Red List is always the current source of truth.

How existing animal profiles are linked

Where FaunaHub already publishes a profile about exactly one species — our tiger or red panda pages, for example — the Red List record links to that page instead of duplicating it, and the profile shows the assessment as its own. Some records point to a page about a group instead: the gorilla page covers both gorilla species, and the elephant page all three elephants. Those pages list each species' assessment separately and say plainly that no single status applies to the group.

Why not every record has a full page

FaunaHub deliberately does not publish a separate page for every species in this dataset. Many records are index entries: they appear in category lists with their status and sources, but do not get a standalone page unless there is enough verified material — and, where possible, a properly licensed photograph — to support one. This avoids thin, low-value pages and keeps the focus on accuracy over volume.

Always verify with conservation authorities

FaunaHub is an educational publisher, not a conservation authority. For decisions that depend on current status — research, policy, travel, or trade — confirm against the official IUCN Red List and the relevant national wildlife agency. Our role is to orient and to point you to the right source.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does a species' conservation status change?
Status changes as populations recover or decline, as new survey data arrives, and as assessment methods improve. The IUCN periodically reassesses species, so a category can move up or down over the years.
Can a species be endangered in one country but not globally?
Yes. IUCN Red List categories describe global extinction risk. A species can be globally secure yet legally protected in a single country, or globally threatened while still locally common somewhere in its range. National red lists and endangered-species laws are maintained separately.
What does FaunaHub's record review date mean?
It is the date we last reviewed a record against its listed sources. It is not the date of the IUCN assessment, which is shown separately with the date FaunaHub checked it. Because status can change between our reviews, the live IUCN Red List is always the current source of truth.
Why don't all species here have their own page?
Many records are index-only: they appear in category lists with their status and sources but do not get a standalone page. We build a full profile only when there is enough verified material, and ideally a properly licensed photograph, to support one.

Last updated: